ABSTRACT
Abstract Background: Recent studies suggest that baseline prolonged PR interval is associated with worse outcome in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). However, a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature have not been made. Objective: To assess the association between baseline prolonged PR interval and adverse outcomes of CRT by a systematic review of the literature and a meta-analysis. Methods: We comprehensively searched the databases of MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception to March 2017. The included studies were published prospective or retrospective cohort studies that compared all-cause mortality, HF hospitalization, and composite outcome of CRT with baseline prolonged PR (> 200 msec) versus normal PR interval. Data from each study were combined using the random-effects, generic inverse variance method of DerSimonian and Laird to calculate the risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Results: Six studies from January 1991 to May 2017 were included in this meta-analysis. All-cause mortality rate is available in four studies involving 17,432 normal PR and 4,278 prolonged PR. Heart failure hospitalization is available in two studies involving 16,152 normal PR and 3,031 prolonged PR. Composite outcome is available in four studies involving 17,001 normal PR and 3,866 prolonged PR. Prolonged PR interval was associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality (pooled risk ratio = 1.34, 95 % confidence interval: 1.08-1.67, p < 0.01, I2= 57.0%), heart failure hospitalization (pooled risk ratio = 1.30, 95 % confidence interval: 1.16-1.45, p < 0.01, I2= 6.6%) and composite outcome (pooled risk ratio = 1.21, 95% confidence interval: 1.13-1.30, p < 0.01, I2= 0%). Conclusions: Our systematic review and meta-analysis support the hypothesis that baseline prolonged PR interval is a predictor of all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalization, and composite outcome in CRT patients.
Resumo Fundamento: Estudos recentes sugerem que intervalo PR basal prolongado está associado a prognóstico ruim para a terapia de ressincronização cardíaca (TRC). No entanto, nunca foram feitas uma revisão sistemática e meta-análise da literatura. Objetivo: Avaliar a associação entre intervalo PR basal prolongado e resultados adversos da TRC por meio de uma revisão sistemática e meta-análise da literatura. Métodos: Pesquisamos de forma abrangente os bancos de dados MEDLINE e EMBASE, desde o início até março de 2017. Os estudos incluídos eram de coorte prospectivos ou retrospectivos que comparavam mortalidade por todas as causas, hospitalização por insuficiência cardíaca e desfecho composto por TRC com PR basal prolongado (> 200 ms) versus intervalo PR normal. Os dados de cada estudo foram combinados pelo modelo de efeitos aleatórios, variância genérica inversa de DerSimonian e Laird para calcular as razões de risco e os intervalos de confiança de 95% (IC95%). Resultados: Foram incluídos seis estudos de janeiro de 1991 a maio de 2017 nesta metanálise. A taxa de mortalidade por todas as causas foi mencionada em quatro estudos envolvendo 17.432 intervalos PR normais e 4.278 prolongados. Hospitalização por insuficiência cardíaca foi abordada em dois estudos envolvendo 16.152 PR normais e 3.031 prolongados. Desfecho composto esteve presente em quatro estudos com 17.001 PR normais e 3.866 prolongadas. Intervalo PR prolongado foi associado a risco aumentado de mortalidade por todas as causas (razão de risco agrupado = 1,34, IC95%: 1,08-1,67, p < 0,01, I2= 57,0%), hospitalização por insuficiência cardíaca (razão de risco agrupado = 1,30, 95 % de IC95%: 1,16-1,45, p < 0,01, I2= 6,6%) e desfecho composto (razão de risco agrupado = 1,21, IC95%: 1,13-1,30, p < 0,01, I2= 0%). Conclusões: Nossa revisão sistemática e metanálise suportam a hipótese de que o intervalo PR basal prolongado é um preditor de mortalidade por todas as causas, hospitalização por insuficiência cardíaca e desfecho composto em pacientes submetidos à TRC.
Subject(s)
Humans , Atrioventricular Block/diagnosis , Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy/methods , Heart Failure/therapy , Prognosis , Treatment Outcome , Risk Assessment , Electrocardiography , Atrioventricular Block/therapy , Heart Failure/physiopathology , Heart Failure/mortality , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Introduction and aim. Endogenous sex hormones are associated with the risk of diabetes and metabolic syndrome. Recent studies suggested the role of these hormones in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies investigating the association between sex hormones and NAFLD. Material and methods. A comprehensive search of the databases of the MEDLINE and EMBASE was performed from inception through April 2016. The inclusion criterion was the observational studies that assessed the association of serum total testosterone (TT) and sex-hormone binding globulin (SHBG) and NAFLD. We calculated pooled effect estimates of TT and SHBG with 95% confidence intervals (Cl) comparing between subjects with and without NAFLD by using random-effects model. Results. Sixteen trials comprising 13,721 men and 5,840 women met the inclusion criteria. TT levels were lower in men with NAFLD (MD = -2.78 nmol/l, 95%CI -3.40 to -2.15, I2 = 99%) than in those without. Men with higher TT levels had lower odds of NAFLD whereas higher TT levels increased the odds of NAFLD in women. In both sexes, SHBG levels were lower in patients with NAFLD than controls and this inverse association was stronger in women than men and higher SHBG levels were associated with reduced odds of NAFLD. Conclusion. Our meta-analysis demonstrated a sex-dependent association between TT and NAFLD. Lower TT levels are associated with men with NAFLD and inversely associated with women with NAFLD, whereas higher SHBG levels are associated with lower NAFLD odds in both men and women.